BC Builders (Whittier)
This is a California-licensed construction business that appears to list a Qualifying Partner and a General Partner who both hold full-time jobs as police officers.
There is no indication of a Responsible Managing Employee (RME), while a separate “Owner” seems to be handling day-to-day operations.
The central issue is that no qualifying individual appears to be actively engaged in supervising and controlling construction work, which may conflict with California Contractors State License Board (CSLB) requirements that a licensed contractor have a responsible person in active charge of operations.
Business Information
BC BUILDERS
7532 VANPORT AVE
WHITTIER, CA 90606
Business Phone Number:(951) 751-5611
EntityPartnership
Issue Date12/06/2012
Expire Date12/31/2026
License Status
This license is current and active.
All information below should be reviewed.
Classifications
B – GENERAL BUILDING
Bonding Information
Contractor’s Bond
This license filed a Contractor’s Bond with JET INSURANCE COMPANY.
Bond Number: JT008901
Bond Amount: $25,000
Effective Date: 06/21/2024
Contractor’s Bond History
Workers’ Compensation
This license is exempt from having workers compensation insurance; they certified that they have no employees at this time.
Effective Date: 12/31/2024
Expire Date: None
Workers’ Compensation History
Contractor’s License Personnel Detail
Contractor License #979212
Contractor NameBC BUILDERS
NameBRUCE LELAND COSS
Title and Class History
TitleQUALIFY PARTNER
ClassificationC39 ROOFING
Association Date12/06/2012
Disassociation Date04/20/2015
TitleQUALIFY PARTNER
ClassificationB GENERAL BUILDING
Association Date08/15/2013
TitleQUALIFY PARTNER
ClassificationC39 ROOFING
Association Date07/12/2018
Disassociation Date05/10/2021
Bonding History
Effective Date07/12/2018
Effective Date08/15/2013
Cancellation Date07/12/2018
Effective Date12/06/2012
Cancellation Date08/15/2013
WHAT MAY BE THE ISSUE
A California-licensed construction company is structured so that the official “responsible” people listed on the license—a Qualifying Partner and a General Partner—both have full-time jobs as police officers. These jobs typically require fixed shifts and leave little ability to manage or supervise another business during the day.
There is no Responsible Managing Employee (RME) listed to take over that supervisory role. Instead, a separate individual labeled as the “Owner” appears to be handling the day-to-day construction operations, such as running jobs and making on-site decisions.
The issue is that California licensing rules require a construction business to always have someone who is actually and actively in charge of construction work—meaning someone who oversees projects, directs work, and is responsible for what happens on job sites. If the people listed on the license are not realistically able to do that, and no properly designated backup (like an RME) exists, it creates a situation where the official license holders may not be the ones actually running the construction work.
IN OTHER WORDS
California construction licensing rules require that a licensed contractor always have a qualified individual in “responsible charge” of the business’s construction activities. This means someone must be actively overseeing work, making project decisions, and maintaining control over operations. That role can be filled by a Responsible Managing Employee (RME) or an owner/partner/officer who qualifies the license, but in all cases the person must be genuinely involved in supervising construction—not just listed on paper.
The concern in the described situation is that the named qualifying individuals (a Qualifying Partner and a General Partner) both hold full-time jobs as police officers, which typically involve fixed shifts and limited ability to manage outside work during the day. There is no indication of a Responsible Managing Employee (RME) serving in their place.
Meanwhile, a separate individual labeled as the “Owner” appears to be handling day-to-day construction operations. If that person is not the qualifying individual on the license, it creates a potential mismatch between who is legally responsible for supervision and who is actually running the work.
CALIFORNIA REQUIREMENTS
California licensing law for contractors is enforced by the Contractors State License Board (CSLB) under the Contractors State License Law (Business & Professions Code, Division 3, Chapter 9). A core requirement of that framework is that every active contractor license must have a qualifying individual in responsible charge of the construction operations at all times.
That requirement shows up in several connected rules. First, the qualifier (whether an owner, partner, officer, or Responsible Managing Employee) must be “actively engaged” in the business and must exercise direct supervision and control over construction activities. In CSLB practice, that means involvement in day-to-day decisions such as job oversight, management of employees or subcontractors, contract execution, and handling project issues as they arise. The law is not just about holding a title; it is about actual operational control.
Second, if the qualifying individual is an RME, CSLB regulations expect substantial ongoing involvement in the employer’s construction operations. If the qualifier is an owner or partner instead, the expectation is similar: real participation in managing the business, not merely lending a license. CSLB commonly refers to violations in this area as situations involving a “nominee” or “rent-a-license,” where the listed qualifier is not meaningfully involved in the work being performed.
In the situation described, the structure raises concerns under these principles. The listed Qualifying Partner and General Partner both appear to have full-time employment as police officers, which typically limits their ability to perform the kind of continuous oversight CSLB requires. There is also no Responsible Managing Employee identified to fulfill that role in their absence. At the same time, a separate individual identified as the “Owner” appears to be running the day-to-day construction operations.
Taken together, that combination can create a compliance risk because it may indicate a gap between the person legally responsible for supervision (the qualifier on the license) and the person actually controlling construction activities in practice. If CSLB determines that no qualifying individual is truly in responsible charge, the license can be subject to disciplinary action, including citations, suspension, or revocation, depending on the severity and evidence.
Contractor Name BC BUILDERS
Name Type DBA
License 979212
City WHITTIER
Status Active
BC BUILDERS
7532 VANPORT AVE
WHITTIER, CA 90606
Business Phone Number: (951) 751-5611
Entity Partnership
Issue Date 12/06/2012
Expire Date 12/31/2026